Trading Strategies

Last reviewed 2026-10-15

Risk management and position sizing

Entry rules get the attention, but position size decides whether a strategy survives its bad years.

Drag across the chart to read values

1% risk per trade3%6%
90265440615790day 0day 100day 200day 300day 400
Identical trade sequence, three sizes. Bigger sizing raises both the peaks and the depth of the drawdowns. Simulated data for illustration only.

Fixed-fractional sizing

Risk a fixed fraction of equity, often 0.5% to 2%, on each trade. The distance to the stop-loss determines how many units to buy:

units = (equity × risk %) / (entry price − stop price)

Example: equity 20,000, risk 1%, entry 50, stop 47. Units = 200 / 3 = 66. Try your own numbers in the position size calculator.

Volatility sizing

Instead of a fixed stop, size by the Average True Range (ATR), so that each position contributes a similar amount of daily volatility. Quiet instruments get larger positions and volatile ones smaller.

The Kelly criterion

For a bet with win probability p and payoff ratio b, the growth-optimal fraction of capital is:

f* = p − (1 − p) / b

Full Kelly is extremely aggressive and very sensitive to errors in p and b. Practitioners who use it at all typically bet a quarter to a half of the Kelly fraction.

Drawdown arithmetic

LossGain needed to recover
10%11.1%
25%33.3%
50%100%
75%300%

The asymmetry is why limiting large losses matters more than maximising the average return.

Correlation

Five positions in five technology stocks are closer to one large position than to five independent ones. Measure risk at the portfolio level, not per trade.

This article is educational. It is not investment advice and does not recommend buying or selling any instrument. Past performance of any rule set does not guarantee future results.